Binfer in dentifrice5/31/2023 ![]() ![]() The correlation of ECM and microradiographic parameters was negative ( p Colgate PreviDent > Placebo-Fluocaril > Fluocaril Bi-Fluoré. Lesion depth (µm) after microradiography in enamel was 100.1 (Placebo), 50.6 (Colgate Winterfresh gel), and 110.2 (Fluocaril, and 97.1 (Colgate PreviDent), and corresponding values in dentine were 169.7, 154.8, 183.7, and 153.5. ![]() Results: Log mean (SD) electronic carries monitor (ECM) measurements in enamel at baseline and after 4 weeks of exposure to the test dentifrices were 4.07(1.53) and 3.87(0.90) (Placebo-Fluocaril), 4.11(1.86) and 4.64(1.43) (Colgate Winterfresh gel), 4.81(0.9) and 4.21(1.20) (Fluocaril Bi-Fluoré), and 4.60(0.88) and 3.76(0.9) (Colgate PreviDent). Remineralization was quantified using transversal microradiography. The measurements were log transformed and Duncan’s multiple range test applied. An Electrical Caries Monitor measured the electrical resistance at baseline and during the four-week test period at weekly intervals. ![]() In between exposure to the test dentifrices, teeth were stored in a saliva storage solution. Each group was exposed to one test dentifrice three times daily for three minutes for 4 weeks. Materials and methods: This in-vitro blind investigation used 20 extracted teeth (four groups of five each). Objectives: To monitor the electrical resistance of artificially demineralized enamel and root dentine after exposure to different fluoridated dentifrices and, using transversal microradiography, to quantify remineralization. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |